Committed to connecting the world

  •  
wtisd

ITU-T work programme

Home : ITU-T Home : ITU-T Work Programme : X.501     
  ITU-T A.5 justification information for referenced document IETF RFC 4511 (2006) in draft X.501
1. Clear description of the referenced document:
Name: IETF RFC 4511 (2006)
Title: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol
2. Status of approval:
Standards track RFC - Proposed Standard (June 2006)
3. Justification for the specific reference:
Rec. ITU-T X.501 references IETF RFC 4511 for LDAP controls and for LDAP extended operations.
4. Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/.
5. Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
Approved in June 2006 as Proposed Standard.
6. The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
Obsoletes RFC 2251, RFC 2830, RFC 3771. Errata exist.
7. Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
IETF RFC 4511 is also referenced in Recs. ITU-T X.509, X.511, X.518, and X.519.
8. Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
Normative References/
[ASN.1] ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (07/2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002 "Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation"./
[BER] ITU-T Rec. X.690 (07/2002) | ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002, "Information technology - ASN.1 encoding rules: Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)", 2002./
[ISO10646] Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - Architecture and Basic Multilingual Plane, ISO/IEC 10646-1 : 1993./
[RFC791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September 1981./
[RFC793] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981./
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
[RFC3454] Hoffman P. and M. Blanchet, "Preparation of Internationalized Strings ('stringprep')", RFC 3454, December 2002./
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003./
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005./
[RFC4013] Zeilenga, K., "SASLprep: Stringprep Profile for User Names and Passwords", RFC 4013, February 2005./
[RFC4234] Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005./
[RFC4346] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The TLS Protocol Version 1.1", RFC 4346, March 2006./
[RFC4422] Melnikov, A., Ed. and K. Zeilenga, Ed., "Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL)", RFC 4422, June 2006./
[RFC4510] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC 4510, June 2006./
[RFC4512] Zeilenga, K., Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June 2006./
[RFC4513] Harrison, R., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms", RFC 4513, June 2006./
[RFC4514] Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Distinguished Names", RFC 4514, June 2006./
[RFC4516] Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator", RFC 4516, June 2006./
[RFC4517] Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules", RFC 4517, June 2006./
[RFC4520] Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006./
[Unicode] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version 3.2.0" is defined by "The Unicode Standard, Version 3.0" (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-61633-5), as amended by the "Unicode Standard Annex #27: Unicode 3.1" (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr27/) and by the "Unicode Standard Annex #28: Unicode 3.2" (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr28/)./
[X.500] ITU-T Rec. X.500, "The Directory: Overview of Concepts, Models and Service", 1993./
[X.511] ITU-T Rec. X.511, "The Directory: Abstract Service Definition", 1993./
/
Informative References/
[CharModel] Whistler, K. and M. Davis, "Unicode Technical Report #17, Character Encoding Model", UTR17, http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17/, August 2000./
[Glossary] The Unicode Consortium, "Unicode Glossary", http://www.unicode.org/glossary/./
[PortReg] IANA, "Port Numbers", http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers./
[PROTOS-LDAP] University of Oulu, "PROTOS Test-Suite: c06-ldapv3" http://www.ee.oulu.fi/research/ouspg/protos/testing/c06/ldapv3/.
9. Qualification of ISOC/IETF:
9.1-9.6     Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7     The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8     Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
10. Other (for any supplementary information):
None.
Note: This form is based on Recommendation ITU-T A.5